[clang-tools-extra] [clang-doc] add support for enums comments in html generation (PR #101282)

[Paul Kirth via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -372,14 +397,33 @@ genEnumsBlock(const std::vector<EnumInfo> &Enums,
 }
 
 static std::unique_ptr<TagNode>
-genEnumMembersBlock(const llvm::SmallVector<EnumValueInfo, 4> &Members) {
+genEnumMembersBlock(const llvm::SmallVector<EnumValueInfo, 4> &Members,
+                    bool HasComments) {
   if (Members.empty())
     return nullptr;
 
-  auto List = std::make_unique<TagNode>(HTMLTag::TAG_UL);
-  for (const auto &M : Members)
-    List->Children.emplace_back(
-        std::make_unique<TagNode>(HTMLTag::TAG_LI, M.Name));
+  auto List = std::make_unique<TagNode>(HTMLTag::TAG_TBODY);
+
+  for (const auto &M : Members) {
+    auto TRNode = std::make_unique<TagNode>(HTMLTag::TAG_TR);
+    TRNode->Children.emplace_back(
+        std::make_unique<TagNode>(HTMLTag::TAG_TD, M.Name));
+    // Use user supplied value if it exists, otherwise use the value
+    if (!M.ValueExpr.empty()) {
+      TRNode->Children.emplace_back(
+          std::make_unique<TagNode>(HTMLTag::TAG_TD, M.ValueExpr));
+    } else {
+      TRNode->Children.emplace_back(
+          std::make_unique<TagNode>(HTMLTag::TAG_TD, M.Value));
+    }
+
+    if (HasComments) {
----------------
ilovepi wrote:

Do you need this passed in? can't you just determine this on demand in this function? The processing I see in the caller looks like its just iterating over Members. I'd think that its better to only do that here, where its required and used, rather than forcing the caller to do that. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101282