[clang] [attributes][-Wunsafe-buffer-usage] Support adding unsafe_buffer_usage attribute to struct fields (PR #101585)
Artem Dergachev via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Aug 6 13:27:03 PDT 2024
================
@@ -926,22 +926,27 @@ class CArrayToPtrAssignmentGadget : public FixableGadget {
/// A call of a function or method that performs unchecked buffer operations
/// over one of its pointer parameters.
class UnsafeBufferUsageAttrGadget : public WarningGadget {
- constexpr static const char *const OpTag = "call_expr";
- const CallExpr *Op;
+ constexpr static const char *const OpTag = "attr_expr";
+ const Expr *Op;
public:
UnsafeBufferUsageAttrGadget(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result)
: WarningGadget(Kind::UnsafeBufferUsageAttr),
- Op(Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>(OpTag)) {}
+ Op(Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<Expr>(OpTag)) {}
static bool classof(const Gadget *G) {
return G->getKind() == Kind::UnsafeBufferUsageAttr;
}
static Matcher matcher() {
+ auto HasUnsafeFielDecl =
+ member(fieldDecl(hasAttr(attr::UnsafeBufferUsage)));
+
auto HasUnsafeFnDecl =
callee(functionDecl(hasAttr(attr::UnsafeBufferUsage)));
- return stmt(callExpr(HasUnsafeFnDecl).bind(OpTag));
+
+ return stmt(expr(anyOf(callExpr(HasUnsafeFnDecl).bind(OpTag),
----------------
haoNoQ wrote:
I suspect that `stmt(expr(...))` is redundant. You probably need at most one of those.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101585
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list