[clang] [llvm] [Clang] Fix definition of layout-compatible to ignore empty classes (PR #92103)
John McCall via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 31 15:08:08 PDT 2024
================
@@ -160,6 +160,9 @@ Bug Fixes in This Version
Bug Fixes to Compiler Builtins
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+- ``__is_layout_compatible`` no longer requires the empty bases to be the same in two
+ standard-layout classes. It now only compares non-static data members.
----------------
rjmccall wrote:
Hmm. I was under the impression that this feature had not been previously released; is that incorrect?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92103
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list