[clang] [clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] bugprone-implicit-widening ignores unsigned consts (PR #101073)

[Chris Warner via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -49,8 +49,7 @@ Options
 
    If the multiplication operands are compile-time constants (like literals or
    are ``constexpr``) and fit within the source expression type, do not emit a
-   diagnostic or suggested fix.  Only considers expressions where the source
-   expression is a signed integer type.  Defaults to ``false``.
+   diagnostic or suggested fix.  Defaults to ``false``.
----------------
cwarner-8702 wrote:

Should it be changed just for option values, or for all uses of double-backticks?  What is the semantic difference between single backticks and double ones? 

(Sorry, I've only ever used GitHub-flavored Markdown, which uses single backticks for inline code snippets, and triple ones for out-of-line snippets)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101073