[clang] [Clang] Initializer list on RHS of assignment (PR #100548)

[via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -14578,21 +14578,56 @@ ExprResult Sema::CreateBuiltinBinOp(SourceLocation OpLoc,
                                     BinaryOperatorKind Opc,
                                     Expr *LHSExpr, Expr *RHSExpr) {
   if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus11 && isa<InitListExpr>(RHSExpr)) {
-    // The syntax only allows initializer lists on the RHS of assignment,
-    // so we don't need to worry about accepting invalid code for
-    // non-assignment operators.
-    // C++11 5.17p9:
-    //   The meaning of x = {v} [...] is that of x = T(v) [...]. The meaning
-    //   of x = {} is x = T().
-    InitializationKind Kind = InitializationKind::CreateDirectList(
-        RHSExpr->getBeginLoc(), RHSExpr->getBeginLoc(), RHSExpr->getEndLoc());
-    InitializedEntity Entity =
-        InitializedEntity::InitializeTemporary(LHSExpr->getType());
-    InitializationSequence InitSeq(*this, Entity, Kind, RHSExpr);
-    ExprResult Init = InitSeq.Perform(*this, Entity, Kind, RHSExpr);
-    if (Init.isInvalid())
-      return Init;
-    RHSExpr = Init.get();
+    // C++11 [expr.ass]p9, per CWG2768:
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:

I'd rather quote a version of the standard to which the wording is applied

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100548