[clang] [Clang][Sema] Make UnresolvedLookupExprs in class scope explicit specializations instantiation dependent (PR #100392)

Krystian Stasiowski via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 24 09:03:56 PDT 2024

Previous message: [clang] 073c199 - [Clang][AST] Don't use canonical type when checking dependence in Type::isOverloadable (#98563)
Next message: [clang] [Clang][Sema] Make UnresolvedLookupExprs in class scope explicit specializations instantiation dependent (PR #100392)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

sdkrystian wrote:

> For tests, I think we can just dump & validate the AST for the specialization, WDYT?

Sounds reasonable, I'll do that.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100392

Previous message: [clang] 073c199 - [Clang][AST] Don't use canonical type when checking dependence in Type::isOverloadable (#98563)
Next message: [clang] [Clang][Sema] Make UnresolvedLookupExprs in class scope explicit specializations instantiation dependent (PR #100392)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the cfe-commits mailing list