[clang] [libcxx] [Clang] Add __common_type builtin (PR #99473)
via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 23 03:03:27 PDT 2024
================
@@ -3058,6 +3058,141 @@ void Sema::NoteAllFoundTemplates(TemplateName Name) {
}
}
+static std::optional<QualType> commonTypeImpl(Sema &S,
+ TemplateName BaseTemplate,
+ SourceLocation TemplateLoc,
+ ArrayRef<TemplateArgument> Ts) {
+ auto lookUpCommonType = [&](TemplateArgument T1,
+ TemplateArgument T2) -> std::optional<QualType> {
+ // Don't bother looking for other specializations if both types are
+ // builtins - users aren't allowed to specialize for them
+ if (T1.getAsType()->isBuiltinType() && T2.getAsType()->isBuiltinType())
+ return commonTypeImpl(S, BaseTemplate, TemplateLoc, {T1, T2});
+
+ TemplateArgumentListInfo Args;
+ Args.addArgument(TemplateArgumentLoc(
+ T1, S.Context.getTrivialTypeSourceInfo(T1.getAsType())));
+ Args.addArgument(TemplateArgumentLoc(
+ T2, S.Context.getTrivialTypeSourceInfo(T2.getAsType())));
+ QualType BaseTemplateInst =
+ S.CheckTemplateIdType(BaseTemplate, TemplateLoc, Args);
+ if (S.RequireCompleteType(TemplateLoc, BaseTemplateInst,
+ diag::err_incomplete_type))
+ return std::nullopt;
+ if (QualType Type = S.getTypeMember("type", BaseTemplateInst);
+ !Type.isNull()) {
+ return Type;
+ }
+ return std::nullopt;
+ };
+
+ // Note A: For the common_type trait applied to a template parameter pack T of
+ // types, the member type shall be either defined or not present as follows:
+ switch (Ts.size()) {
+
+ // If sizeof...(T) is zero, there shall be no member type.
+ case 0:
+ return std::nullopt;
+
+ // If sizeof...(T) is one, let T0 denote the sole type constituting the
+ // pack T. The member typedef-name type shall denote the same type, if any, as
+ // common_type_t<T0, T0>; otherwise there shall be no member type.
+ case 1:
+ return lookUpCommonType(Ts[0], Ts[0]);
+
+ // If sizeof...(T) is two, let the first and second types constituting T be
+ // denoted by T1 and T2, respectively, and let D1 and D2 denote the same types
+ // as decay_t<T1> and decay_t<T2>, respectively.
+ case 2: {
+ QualType T1 = Ts[0].getAsType();
+ QualType T2 = Ts[1].getAsType();
+ QualType D1 = S.BuiltinDecay(T1, {});
+ QualType D2 = S.BuiltinDecay(T2, {});
+
+ // If is_same_v<T1, D1> is false or is_same_v<T2, D2> is false, let C denote
+ // the same type, if any, as common_type_t<D1, D2>.
+ if (!S.Context.hasSameType(T1, D1) || !S.Context.hasSameType(T2, D2)) {
+ return lookUpCommonType(D1, D2);
+ }
----------------
Sirraide wrote:
```suggestion
if (!S.Context.hasSameType(T1, D1) || !S.Context.hasSameType(T2, D2))
return lookUpCommonType(D1, D2);
```
nit: no braces around single-statement `if`s (unless that single statement is egregiously big)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99473
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list