[clang] [Clang] Refactor uses of `Cand->Function` in SemaOverload.cpp (PR #98965)

[via cfe-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff 87ca6386f9389f9d929d660e37701590092cefab ef007ca0c0119298767bbc9f1a345969fe6e8c03 --extensions cpp -- clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
index 5712ab0377..355d49f0a4 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
@@ -11468,8 +11468,8 @@ static void DiagnoseArityMismatch(Sema &S, NamedDecl *Found, Decl *D,
 /// Arity mismatch diagnosis specific to a function overload candidate.
 static void DiagnoseArityMismatch(Sema &S, OverloadCandidate *Cand,
                                   unsigned NumFormalArgs) {
-    assert(Cand->Function && "Candidate must be a function");
-    FunctionDecl *Fn = Cand->Function;
+  assert(Cand->Function && "Candidate must be a function");
+  FunctionDecl *Fn = Cand->Function;
   if (!CheckArityMismatch(S, Cand, NumFormalArgs, Cand->TookAddressOfOverload))
     DiagnoseArityMismatch(S, Cand->FoundDecl, Fn, NumFormalArgs,
                           Cand->TookAddressOfOverload);
@@ -11771,8 +11771,8 @@ static void DiagnoseBadDeduction(Sema &S, NamedDecl *Found, Decl *Templated,
 static void DiagnoseBadDeduction(Sema &S, OverloadCandidate *Cand,
                                  unsigned NumArgs,
                                  bool TakingCandidateAddress) {
-    assert(Cand->Function && "Candidate must be a function");
-    FunctionDecl *Fn = Cand->Function;
+  assert(Cand->Function && "Candidate must be a function");
+  FunctionDecl *Fn = Cand->Function;
   TemplateDeductionResult TDK = Cand->DeductionFailure.getResult();
   if (TDK == TemplateDeductionResult::TooFewArguments ||
       TDK == TemplateDeductionResult::TooManyArguments) {

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98965