[clang] [clang][dataflow] Teach `AnalysisASTVisitor` that `typeid()` can be evaluated. (PR #96731)

via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jun 25 21:48:33 PDT 2024


llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: None (martinboehme)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

We were previously treating the operand of `typeid()` as being definitely
unevaluated, but it can be evaluated if it is a glvalue of polymorphic type.

This patch includes a test that fails without the fix.


---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96731.diff


2 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang/include/clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/ASTOps.h (+5-1) 
- (modified) clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/TransferTest.cpp (+43) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/ASTOps.h b/clang/include/clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/ASTOps.h
index 925b99af9141a..f9c923a36ad22 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/ASTOps.h
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/ASTOps.h
@@ -113,7 +113,11 @@ class AnalysisASTVisitor : public RecursiveASTVisitor<Derived> {
   // nevertheless it appears in the Clang CFG, so we don't exclude it here.
   bool TraverseDecltypeTypeLoc(DecltypeTypeLoc) { return true; }
   bool TraverseTypeOfExprTypeLoc(TypeOfExprTypeLoc) { return true; }
-  bool TraverseCXXTypeidExpr(CXXTypeidExpr *) { return true; }
+  bool TraverseCXXTypeidExpr(CXXTypeidExpr *TIE) {
+    if (TIE->isPotentiallyEvaluated())
+      return RecursiveASTVisitor<Derived>::TraverseCXXTypeidExpr(TIE);
+    return true;
+  }
   bool TraverseUnaryExprOrTypeTraitExpr(UnaryExprOrTypeTraitExpr *) {
     return true;
   }
diff --git a/clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/TransferTest.cpp b/clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/TransferTest.cpp
index 2a74d7fa63fd7..10d7ec9380ab8 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/TransferTest.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/TransferTest.cpp
@@ -1637,6 +1637,49 @@ TEST(TransferTest, StructModeledFieldsWithAccessor) {
       });
 }
 
+TEST(TransferTest, StructModeledFieldsInTypeid) {
+  // Test that we model fields mentioned inside a `typeid()` expression only if
+  // that expression is potentially evaluated -- i.e. if the expression inside
+  // `typeid()` is a glvalue of polymorphic type (see
+  // `CXXTypeidExpr::isPotentiallyEvaluated()` and [expr.typeid]p3).
+  std::string Code = R"(
+    // Definitions needed for `typeid`.
+    namespace std {
+      class type_info {};
+      class bad_typeid {};
+    }  // namespace std
+
+    struct NonPolymorphic {};
+
+    struct Polymorphic {
+      virtual ~Polymorphic() = default;
+    };
+
+    struct S {
+      NonPolymorphic *NonPoly;
+      Polymorphic *Poly;
+    };
+
+    void target(S &s) {
+      typeid(*s.NonPoly);
+      typeid(*s.Poly);
+      // [[p]]
+    }
+  )";
+  runDataflow(
+      Code,
+      [](const llvm::StringMap<DataflowAnalysisState<NoopLattice>> &Results,
+         ASTContext &ASTCtx) {
+        const Environment &Env = getEnvironmentAtAnnotation(Results, "p");
+        auto &SLoc = getLocForDecl<RecordStorageLocation>(ASTCtx, Env, "s");
+        std::vector<const ValueDecl *> Fields;
+        for (auto [Field, _] : SLoc.children())
+          Fields.push_back(Field);
+        EXPECT_THAT(Fields,
+                    UnorderedElementsAre(findValueDecl(ASTCtx, "Poly")));
+      });
+}
+
 TEST(TransferTest, StructModeledFieldsWithComplicatedInheritance) {
   std::string Code = R"(
     struct Base1 {

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96731


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list