[clang] [Clang] Introduce 'clang-nvlink-wrappaer' to work around 'nvlink' (PR #96561)

[Joseph Huber via cfe-commits]

jhuber6 wrote:

@MaskRay So, I think my symbol resolution is (unsurprisingly) subtly broken. Is there a canonical way to handle this? I first thought that we could simply perform the symbol resolutions as normal for every file, but keep track of which symbols were "lazy". However, I couldn't figure out how to then tell if a lazy symbol should be extracted or not because there's no information on which files use which symbols. Maybe I just scan all the files and see if they reference a symbol that's marked defined and lazy?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96561