[clang-tools-extra] Enforce SL.con.3: Add check to replace operator[] with at() [Cont.] (PR #95220)

[Carlos Galvez via cfe-commits]

Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>,
Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>,
Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>,
Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>,
Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>,
Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>,
Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>,
Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>,
Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>,
Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>,
Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>,
Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>,
Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>,
Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95220 at github.com>


carlosgalvezp wrote:

> Does the fact that this check implements the bounds profile need to be mentioned anywhere else? Or is it enough to have it be implicit, e.g., via the name.

Not that I'm aware of. It could be worth mentioning in the check documentation though, see for example existing checks:
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-array-to-pointer-decay.html

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95220