[clang-tools-extra] Enforce SL.con.3: Add check to replace operator[] with at() [Cont.] (PR #95220)

[Paul Heidekrüger via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+//===--- PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h - clang-tidy ------*- C++ -*-===//
+//===--- PreferMemberInitializerCheck.h - clang-tidy ------------*- C++ -*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_PREFERATOVERSUBSCRIPTOPERATORCHECK_H
+#define LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_PREFERATOVERSUBSCRIPTOPERATORCHECK_H
+
+#include "../ClangTidyCheck.h"
+
+namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines {
+
+/// Enforce CPP core guidelines SL.con.3
----------------
PBHDK wrote:

Maybe we can just replace the Doxygen comment above with what's in the  release notes + check description right now:

> Flags the unsafe ``operator[]`` and suggests replacing it with ``at()``.

What do you think?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95220