[clang] [libc++] Add builtin to clear padding bytes (prework for P0528R3) (PR #75371)

[via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -2456,6 +2461,139 @@ static RValue EmitHipStdParUnsupportedBuiltin(CodeGenFunction *CGF,
   return RValue::get(CGF->Builder.CreateCall(UBF, Args));
 }
 
+template <class T>
+void RecursivelyClearPaddingImpl(CodeGenFunction &CGF, Value *Ptr, QualType Ty, size_t CurrentStartOffset, size_t &RunningOffset, T&& WriteZeroAtOffset);
+
+template <class T>
+void ClearPaddingStruct(CodeGenFunction &CGF, Value *Ptr, QualType Ty, StructType *ST, 
+                        size_t CurrentStartOffset, size_t &RunningOffset, T&& WriteZeroAtOffset) {
+  std::cerr << "\n struct! " << ST->getName().data() << std::endl;
+  auto SL = CGF.CGM.getModule().getDataLayout().getStructLayout(ST);
+
+  auto R = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(Ty->getAsRecordDecl());
+  if(!R) {
+    std::cerr << "\n not a CXXRecordDecl" << std::endl;
+
+  }
+  const ASTRecordLayout &ASTLayout = CGF.getContext().getASTRecordLayout(R);
+  for (auto Base : R->bases()) {
+    std::cerr << "\n\n base!"  << std::endl;
+    // Zero padding between base elements.
+    auto BaseRecord = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(Base.getType()->getAsRecordDecl());
+    auto Offset = static_cast<size_t>(
+        ASTLayout.getBaseClassOffset(BaseRecord).getQuantity());
+    // Recursively zero out base classes.
+    auto Index = SL->getElementContainingOffset(Offset);
+    Value *Idx = CGF.Builder.getSize(Index);
+    llvm::Type *CurrentBaseType = CGF.ConvertTypeForMem(Base.getType());
+    Value *BaseElement = CGF.Builder.CreateGEP(CurrentBaseType, Ptr, Idx);
+    RecursivelyClearPaddingImpl(CGF, BaseElement, Base.getType(), CurrentStartOffset + Offset, RunningOffset, WriteZeroAtOffset);
+  }
+
+  size_t NumFields = std::distance(R->field_begin(), R->field_end());
+  auto CurrentField = R->field_begin();
+  for (size_t I = 0; I < NumFields; ++I, ++CurrentField) {
+    // Size needs to be in bytes so we can compare it later.
+    auto Offset = ASTLayout.getFieldOffset(I) / 8;
+    auto Index = SL->getElementContainingOffset(Offset);
----------------
huixie90 wrote:

no not at the moment. I need to figure out how to do it.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75371