[clang] 46b3145 - [clang][analyzer][NFC] Add test for a limitation of alpha.unix.BlockInCriticalSection checker (#93799)
via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri May 31 03:51:17 PDT 2024
Author: Endre Fülöp
Date: 2024-05-31T12:51:14+02:00
New Revision: 46b3145b7c6bbe7014f9e790236717e4f8a711d8
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/46b3145b7c6bbe7014f9e790236717e4f8a711d8
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/46b3145b7c6bbe7014f9e790236717e4f8a711d8.diff
LOG: [clang][analyzer][NFC] Add test for a limitation of alpha.unix.BlockInCriticalSection checker (#93799)
Updated the documentation in `checkers.rst` to include an example of how
`trylock` function is handled.
Added a new test for a scenario where `pthread_mutex_trylock` is used,
demonstrating the current limitation.
Added:
Modified:
clang/docs/analyzer/checkers.rst
clang/test/Analysis/block-in-critical-section.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/clang/docs/analyzer/checkers.rst b/clang/docs/analyzer/checkers.rst
index 3881ceceeed6b..bbc31832b9c3c 100644
--- a/clang/docs/analyzer/checkers.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/analyzer/checkers.rst
@@ -3157,6 +3157,22 @@ Critical section handling functions modelled by this checker: ``lock, unlock, pt
// still inside of the critical section of the std::lock_guard
}
+**Limitations**
+
+* The ``trylock`` and ``timedlock`` versions of acquiring locks are currently assumed to always succeed.
+ This can lead to false positives.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ void trylock_example(pthread_mutex_t *m) {
+ if (pthread_mutex_trylock(m) == 0) { // assume trylock always succeeds
+ sleep(10); // warn: Call to blocking function 'sleep' inside of critical section
+ pthread_mutex_unlock(m);
+ } else {
+ sleep(10); // false positive: Incorrect warning about blocking function inside critical section.
+ }
+ }
+
.. _alpha-unix-Chroot:
alpha.unix.Chroot (C)
diff --git a/clang/test/Analysis/block-in-critical-section.cpp b/clang/test/Analysis/block-in-critical-section.cpp
index 87c26b9f1b520..403b7a16726a2 100644
--- a/clang/test/Analysis/block-in-critical-section.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/Analysis/block-in-critical-section.cpp
@@ -36,15 +36,15 @@ ssize_t read(int fd, void *buf, size_t count);
ssize_t recv(int sockfd, void *buf, size_t len, int flags);
struct pthread_mutex_t;
-void pthread_mutex_lock(pthread_mutex_t *mutex);
-void pthread_mutex_trylock(pthread_mutex_t *mutex);
-void pthread_mutex_unlock(pthread_mutex_t *mutex);
+int pthread_mutex_lock(pthread_mutex_t *mutex);
+int pthread_mutex_trylock(pthread_mutex_t *mutex);
+int pthread_mutex_unlock(pthread_mutex_t *mutex);
struct mtx_t;
-void mtx_lock(mtx_t *mutex);
-void mtx_timedlock(mtx_t *mutex);
-void mtx_trylock(mtx_t *mutex);
-void mtx_unlock(mtx_t *mutex);
+int mtx_lock(mtx_t *mutex);
+int mtx_timedlock(mtx_t *mutex);
+int mtx_trylock(mtx_t *mutex);
+int mtx_unlock(mtx_t *mutex);
// global params for dummy function calls
FILE *stream;
@@ -292,3 +292,20 @@ void testBlockInCriticalSectionUniqueLockNested() {
testBlockInCriticalSectionUniqueLock(); // expected-note {{Calling 'testBlockInCriticalSectionUniqueLock'}}
sleep(1); // no-warning
}
+
+void testTrylockCurrentlyFalsePositive(pthread_mutex_t *m) {
+ // expected-note at +4 {{Assuming the condition is true}}
+ // expected-note at +3 {{Taking true branch}}
+ // expected-note at +2 {{Assuming the condition is false}}
+ // expected-note at +1 {{Taking false branch}}
+ if (pthread_mutex_trylock(m) == 0) { // expected-note 2 {{Entering critical section here}}
+ // FIXME: we are entering the critical section only in the true branch
+ sleep(10); // expected-warning {{Call to blocking function 'sleep' inside of critical section}}
+ // expected-note at -1 {{Call to blocking function 'sleep' inside of critical section}}
+ pthread_mutex_unlock(m);
+ } else {
+ sleep(10); // expected-warning {{Call to blocking function 'sleep' inside of critical section}}
+ // expected-note at -1 {{Call to blocking function 'sleep' inside of critical section}}
+ // FIXME: this is a false positive, the lock was not acquired
+ }
+}
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list