[clang-tools-extra] Update identifier-length.rst (PR #93467)

[via cfe-commits]

llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy

Author: Mattan Elkaim (mattanelkaim)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

Swapped code blocks of parameter and variable, which have been confused

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93467.diff


1 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/identifier-length.rst (+5-5) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/identifier-length.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/identifier-length.rst
index 44d97f7b363bf..271970c292c8f 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/identifier-length.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/identifier-length.rst
@@ -28,10 +28,7 @@ The following options are described below:
 
     .. code-block:: c++
 
-         int doubler(int x)   // warns that x is too short
-         {
-            return 2 * x;
-         }
+      int i = 42;    // warns that 'i' is too short
 
     This check does not have any fix suggestions in the general case since
     variable names have semantic value.
@@ -50,7 +47,10 @@ The following options are described below:
 
     .. code-block:: c++
 
-      int i = 42;    // warns that 'i' is too short
+         int doubler(int x)   // warns that x is too short
+         {
+            return 2 * x;
+         }
 
     This check does not have any fix suggestions in the general case since
     variable names have semantic value.

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93467