[clang-tools-extra] [clangd] [C++20] [Modules] Introduce initial support for C++20 Modules (PR #66462)
kadir çetinkaya via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 22 01:57:42 PDT 2024
================
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+//===----------------- ModulesBuilder.h --------------------------*- C++-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Experimental support for C++20 Modules.
+//
+// Currently we simplify the implementations by preventing reusing module files
+// across different versions and different source files. But this is clearly a
+// waste of time and space in the end of the day.
+//
+// FIXME: Supporting reusing module files across different versions and
+// different source files.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANGD_MODULES_BUILDER_H
+#define LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANGD_MODULES_BUILDER_H
+
+#include "GlobalCompilationDatabase.h"
+#include "ProjectModules.h"
+
+#include "support/Path.h"
+#include "support/ThreadsafeFS.h"
+
+#include "llvm/ADT/SmallString.h"
+
+#include <memory>
+
+namespace clang {
+namespace clangd {
+
+class PrerequisiteModules;
+
+/// This class handles building module files for a given source file.
+///
+/// In the future, we want the class to manage the module files acorss
+/// different versions and different source files.
+class ModulesBuilder {
+public:
+ ModulesBuilder() = delete;
+
+ ModulesBuilder(const GlobalCompilationDatabase &CDB) : CDB(CDB) {}
+
+ ModulesBuilder(const ModulesBuilder &) = delete;
+ ModulesBuilder(ModulesBuilder &&) = delete;
+
+ ModulesBuilder &operator=(const ModulesBuilder &) = delete;
+ ModulesBuilder &operator=(ModulesBuilder &&) = delete;
+
+ ~ModulesBuilder() = default;
----------------
kadircet wrote:
again i don't think there's a difference between the implicit vs explicitly default'd destructor here
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66462
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list