[clang] [clang-format] Fix a regression in annotating goto labels (PR #92494)
Owen Pan via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu May 16 21:16:20 PDT 2024
https://github.com/owenca updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92494
>From d9f113101028c68465e8befe7db1d4c206daa535 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan <owenpiano at gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 20:49:17 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Fix a bug in formatting goto labels in macros
Fixes #92300.
---
clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp | 9 ++-------
clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp | 8 ++++++++
clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp | 13 +++++++++++++
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp b/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
index b15a87327240b..3dd10f6bd2b31 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
@@ -1189,12 +1189,6 @@ void UnwrappedLineParser::parsePPDefine() {
return;
}
- if (FormatTok->is(tok::identifier) &&
- Tokens->peekNextToken()->is(tok::colon)) {
- nextToken();
- nextToken();
- }
-
// Errors during a preprocessor directive can only affect the layout of the
// preprocessor directive, and thus we ignore them. An alternative approach
// would be to use the same approach we use on the file level (no
@@ -1681,7 +1675,8 @@ void UnwrappedLineParser::parseStructuralElement(
if (!Style.isJavaScript() && !Style.isVerilog() && !Style.isTableGen() &&
Tokens->peekNextToken()->is(tok::colon) && !Line->MustBeDeclaration) {
nextToken();
- Line->Tokens.begin()->Tok->MustBreakBefore = true;
+ if (!Line->InMacroBody || CurrentLines->size() > 1)
+ Line->Tokens.begin()->Tok->MustBreakBefore = true;
FormatTok->setFinalizedType(TT_GotoLabelColon);
parseLabel(!Style.IndentGotoLabels);
if (HasLabel)
diff --git a/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp b/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
index 6f57f10e12e88..2f0c0f0266774 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
@@ -3124,6 +3124,7 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, FormatsLabels) {
" g();\n"
" }\n"
"}");
+
FormatStyle Style = getLLVMStyle();
Style.IndentGotoLabels = false;
verifyFormat("void f() {\n"
@@ -3163,6 +3164,13 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, FormatsLabels) {
" }\n"
"}",
Style);
+
+ Style.ColumnLimit = 15;
+ verifyFormat("#define FOO \\\n"
+ "label: \\\n"
+ " break;",
+ Style);
+
// The opening brace may either be on the same unwrapped line as the colon or
// on a separate one. The formatter should recognize both.
Style = getLLVMStyle();
diff --git a/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp b/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
index aadfa6dc0165c..83d9cc766ae5f 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
@@ -2581,15 +2581,28 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsLabels) {
auto Tokens = annotate("{ x: break; }");
ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 7u) << Tokens;
EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[2], tok::colon, TT_GotoLabelColon);
+
Tokens = annotate("{ case x: break; }");
ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 8u) << Tokens;
EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[3], tok::colon, TT_CaseLabelColon);
+
Tokens = annotate("{ x: { break; } }");
ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 9u) << Tokens;
EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[2], tok::colon, TT_GotoLabelColon);
+
Tokens = annotate("{ case x: { break; } }");
ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 10u) << Tokens;
EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[3], tok::colon, TT_CaseLabelColon);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("#define FOO label:");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 6u) << Tokens;
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::colon, TT_GotoLabelColon);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("#define FOO \\\n"
+ "label: \\\n"
+ " break;");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 8u) << Tokens;
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::colon, TT_GotoLabelColon);
}
TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsNestedBlocks) {
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list