[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] Add `bugprone-virtual-arithmetic` check (PR #91951)
Julian Schmidt via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon May 13 07:15:28 PDT 2024
================
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+//===--- VirtualArithmeticCheck.cpp - clang-tidy---------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "VirtualArithmeticCheck.h"
+#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
+#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
+
+using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
+
+namespace clang::tidy::bugprone {
+
+void VirtualArithmeticCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
+ const auto PointerExprWithVirtualMethod =
+ expr(hasType(pointerType(pointee(hasDeclaration(
+ cxxRecordDecl(hasMethod(isVirtualAsWritten())))))))
+ .bind("pointer");
+
+ const auto ArraySubscript =
+ arraySubscriptExpr(hasBase(PointerExprWithVirtualMethod));
+
+ const auto BinaryOperators =
+ binaryOperator(hasAnyOperatorName("+", "-", "+=", "-="),
+ hasEitherOperand(PointerExprWithVirtualMethod));
+
+ const auto UnaryOperators =
+ unaryOperator(hasAnyOperatorName("++", "--"),
+ hasUnaryOperand(PointerExprWithVirtualMethod));
+
+ Finder->addMatcher(
+ expr(anyOf(ArraySubscript, BinaryOperators, UnaryOperators)), this);
+}
+
+void VirtualArithmeticCheck::check(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
+ const auto *PointerExpr = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<Expr>("pointer");
+ const CXXRecordDecl *PointeeType =
+ PointerExpr->getType()->getPointeeType()->getAsCXXRecordDecl();
+
+ diag(PointerExpr->getBeginLoc(),
+ "pointer arithmetic on class '%0' that declares a virtual function, "
+ "undefined behavior if the pointee is a different class")
+ << PointeeType->getName();
----------------
5chmidti wrote:
- Please stream the `SourceRange` of `PointerExpr` into the diagnostic, so that it is fully underlined in the diagnostic/editor
- I think the comma should be replaced with `(can) result in`, wdyt?
- You don't have to escape the `%0` with `'` when you pass `PointeeType` without the `getName` instead.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91951
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list