[clang] [BoundsSafety] Allow 'counted_by' attribute on pointers in structs in C (PR #90786)

[Bill Wendling via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -8588,31 +8588,71 @@ static const RecordDecl *GetEnclosingNamedOrTopAnonRecord(const FieldDecl *FD) {
   return RD;
 }
 
-static bool
-CheckCountExpr(Sema &S, FieldDecl *FD, Expr *E,
-               llvm::SmallVectorImpl<TypeCoupledDeclRefInfo> &Decls) {
+enum class CountedByInvalidPointeeTypeKind {
+  INCOMPLETE,
+  SIZELESS,
+  FUNCTION,
+  FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER,
+  VALID,
+};
+
+static bool CheckCountedByAttrOnField(
+    Sema &S, FieldDecl *FD, Expr *E,
+    llvm::SmallVectorImpl<TypeCoupledDeclRefInfo> &Decls) {
+  // Check the context the attribute is used in
+
   if (FD->getParent()->isUnion()) {
     S.Diag(FD->getBeginLoc(), diag::err_counted_by_attr_in_union)
         << FD->getSourceRange();
     return true;
   }
 
-  if (!E->getType()->isIntegerType() || E->getType()->isBooleanType()) {
-    S.Diag(E->getBeginLoc(), diag::err_counted_by_attr_argument_not_integer)
-        << E->getSourceRange();
+  const auto FieldTy = FD->getType();
+  if (!FieldTy->isArrayType() && !FieldTy->isPointerType()) {
+    S.Diag(FD->getBeginLoc(),
+           diag::err_counted_by_attr_not_on_ptr_or_flexible_array_member)
+        << FD->getLocation();
     return true;
   }
 
   LangOptions::StrictFlexArraysLevelKind StrictFlexArraysLevel =
       LangOptions::StrictFlexArraysLevelKind::IncompleteOnly;
-
-  if (!Decl::isFlexibleArrayMemberLike(S.getASTContext(), FD, FD->getType(),
+  if (FieldTy->isArrayType() &&
+      !Decl::isFlexibleArrayMemberLike(S.getASTContext(), FD, FieldTy,
                                        StrictFlexArraysLevel, true)) {
-    // The "counted_by" attribute must be on a flexible array member.
-    SourceRange SR = FD->getLocation();
-    S.Diag(SR.getBegin(),
-           diag::err_counted_by_attr_not_on_flexible_array_member)
-        << SR;
+    S.Diag(FD->getBeginLoc(),
+           diag::err_counted_by_attr_on_array_not_flexible_array_member)
+        << FD->getLocation();
+    return true;
+  }
+
+  if (FieldTy->isPointerType()) {
----------------
bwendling wrote:

> @isanbard Is the above code pattern something you actually want to support? In -fbounds-safety we disallow it because it means computing the bounds of Arr is not constant time because the size of Has_VLA is not a compile time constant. To compute the bounds of Arr at runtime it would require walking every Has_VLA object in Arr to get its count field. That seems expensive and is also at risk of running into a race condition (i.e. the size of a VLA changes while the bounds are being computed).

Is it even valid C? I *suppose* it could be valid if `struct Has_VLA` wasn't allocated with extra bytes, i.e. `count` is 0 and `buffer` has no size.

But that's a horrible use case and I think it's fine to flag it as an error.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90786