[clang] [Clang] Implement P2809: Trivial infinite loops are not Undefined Behavior (PR #90066)
Eli Friedman via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu May 2 11:52:45 PDT 2024
================
@@ -908,6 +908,72 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitIfStmt(const IfStmt &S) {
incrementProfileCounter(&S);
}
+bool CodeGenFunction::checkIfLoopMustProgress(const Expr *ControllingExpression,
+ bool HasEmptyBody) {
+ if (CGM.getCodeGenOpts().getFiniteLoops() ==
+ CodeGenOptions::FiniteLoopsKind::Never)
+ return false;
+
+ // Now apply rules for plain C (see 6.8.5.6 in C11).
+ // Loops with constant conditions do not have to make progress in any C
+ // version.
+ // As an extension, we consisider loops whose constant expression
+ // can be constant-folded.
+ Expr::EvalResult Result;
+ bool CondIsConstInt =
+ !ControllingExpression ||
+ (ControllingExpression->EvaluateAsInt(Result, getContext()) &&
+ Result.Val.isInt());
+
+ bool CondIsTrue = CondIsConstInt && (!ControllingExpression ||
+ Result.Val.getInt().getBoolValue());
+
+ if (getLangOpts().C99 && CondIsConstInt)
----------------
efriedma-quic wrote:
Where did getLangOpts().C99 come from? I think the old code treated c89/c99/c++98 as equivalent (never must-progress).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90066
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list