[clang] [Clang] Fix incorrect handling of #pragma {GCC} unroll N in dependent context (PR #90240)
Erich Keane via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Apr 26 11:22:21 PDT 2024
================
@@ -109,16 +109,20 @@ static Attr *handleLoopHintAttr(Sema &S, Stmt *St, const ParsedAttr &A,
SetHints(LoopHintAttr::Unroll, LoopHintAttr::Disable);
} else if (PragmaName == "unroll") {
// #pragma unroll N
- if (ValueExpr && !ValueExpr->isValueDependent()) {
- llvm::APSInt ValueAPS;
- ExprResult R = S.VerifyIntegerConstantExpression(ValueExpr, &ValueAPS);
- assert(!R.isInvalid() && "unroll count value must be a valid value, it's "
- "should be checked in Sema::CheckLoopHintExpr");
- (void)R;
- // The values of 0 and 1 block any unrolling of the loop.
- if (ValueAPS.isZero() || ValueAPS.isOne())
- SetHints(LoopHintAttr::UnrollCount, LoopHintAttr::Disable);
- else
+ if (ValueExpr) {
+ if (!ValueExpr->isValueDependent()) {
+ llvm::APSInt ValueAPS;
+ ExprResult R = S.VerifyIntegerConstantExpression(ValueExpr, &ValueAPS);
+ assert(!R.isInvalid() &&
+ "unroll count value must be a valid value, it's "
+ "should be checked in Sema::CheckLoopHintExpr");
+ (void)R;
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
Remove this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90240
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list