[clang] [X86][test] Added extra cet tests (PR #88736)

[Phoebe Wang via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -2,12 +2,20 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -E -triple i386 -dM -o - -fcf-protection=branch %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=BRANCH
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -E -triple i386 -dM -o - -fcf-protection=full %s   | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=FULL
 // RUN: not %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm-only -triple i386 -target-cpu pentium-mmx -fcf-protection=branch %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NOCFPROT
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64 -o - -fcf-protection=branch %s -emit-llvm | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CFPROT
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64 -o - -fcf-protection=full %s -emit-llvm | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CFPROTF
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64 -o - -fcf-protection=none %s -emit-llvm | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CFPROTNONE
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -E -triple=x86_64 -dM -o - -fcf-protection=none %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NOTCET
 
 // RETURN: #define __CET__ 2
 // BRANCH: #define __CET__ 1
 // FULL: #define __CET__ 3
 // CFPROT: !{i32 8, !"cf-protection-branch", i32 1}
 
 // NOCFPROT: error: option 'cf-protection=branch' cannot be specified on this target
+// CFPROTF: !{i32 8, !"cf-protection-return", i32 1}
+// CFPROTF-NEXT: !{i32 8, !"cf-protection-branch", i32 1}
+// CFPROTNONE-NOT: cf-protection-branch
----------------
phoebewang wrote:

Change to `cf-protection-` to cover both.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88736