[clang] [clang][PowerPC] Add flag to enable compatibility with GNU for complex arguments (PR #77732)

[zhijian lin via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -396,12 +405,80 @@ CharUnits PPC32_SVR4_ABIInfo::getParamTypeAlignment(QualType Ty) const {
   return CharUnits::fromQuantity(4);
 }
 
+ABIArgInfo PPC32_SVR4_ABIInfo::handleComplex(uint64_t &TypeSize) const {
+  llvm::Type *ElemTy;
+  unsigned RegsNeeded; // Registers Needed for Complex.
+
+  // Choice of using llvm::Type::getInt64Ty(getVMContext()) for complex
+  // single-precision floats is based on the ABI ATR-PASS-COMPLEX-IN-GPRS
+  // specification. According to the specification:
+  // - For complex single-precision floats: If the register (gr) is even, it's
+  // incremented by one, and the lower-addressed word of the argument is loaded
+  // into gr, while the higher-addressed word is loaded into gr + 1. Then, gr is
+  // incremented by 2.
+  // - For complex double-precision floats: The words of the argument are loaded
+  // in memory-address order into gr, gr + 1, gr + 2, and gr + 3, with gr being
+  // incremented by 4. Thus, to maintain even alignment and adhere to the ABI
+  // specification, llvm::Type::getInt64Ty(getVMContext()) is used when TypeSize
+  // is 64. Powerpc backend handles this alignment requirement. Specifically,
+  // you can refer to the CC_PPC32_SVR4_Custom_AlignArgRegs method from
+  // PPCCallingconvention.cpp. For more context, refer to the previous
+  // discussion: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146942 and the related LLVM pull
+  // request: #77732
+
+  if (TypeSize == 64) {
+    ElemTy = llvm::Type::getInt64Ty(getVMContext());
+    RegsNeeded = 1;
+  } else {
+    ElemTy = llvm::Type::getInt32Ty(getVMContext());
+    RegsNeeded = TypeSize >> 5;
+  }
+  return ABIArgInfo::getDirect(llvm::ArrayType::get(ElemTy, RegsNeeded));
+}
+
+ABIArgInfo PPC32_SVR4_ABIInfo::classifyArgumentType(QualType Ty,
+                                                    int &ArgGPRsLeft) const {
+  Ty = useFirstFieldIfTransparentUnion(Ty);
+
+  if (!(getCodeGenOpts().getComplexInRegABI() == CodeGenOptions::CMPLX_InGPR) ||
+      !ArgGPRsLeft)
----------------
diggerlin wrote:

` if (!(getCodeGenOpts().getComplexInRegABI() == CodeGenOptions::CMPLX_InGPR) || !ArgGPRsLeft)`
 
 -->
`  if (getCodeGenOpts().getComplexInRegABI() != CodeGenOptions::CMPLX_InGPR ||  !ArgGPRsLeft)`

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77732