[clang] [llvm] [NFC] Fix misspellings of effects (PR #87795)

[via cfe-commits]

llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms

Author: None (Zentrik)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>



---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87795.diff


2 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp (+1-1) 
- (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp (+1-1) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp
index 6cc88679458140..845a5f9b390dc4 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
 // was not consciously intended, and therefore it might have been unreachable.
 //
 // This checker uses eval::Call for modeling pure functions (functions without
-// side effets), for which their `Summary' is a precise model. This avoids
+// side effects), for which their `Summary' is a precise model. This avoids
 // unnecessary invalidation passes. Conflicts with other checkers are unlikely
 // because if the function has no other effects, other checkers would probably
 // never want to improve upon the modeling done by this checker.
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp
index 9caaf720ec9138..056be8629b9617 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp
@@ -4019,7 +4019,7 @@ bool NewGVN::eliminateInstructions(Function &F) {
           // dominated defs as dead.
           if (Def) {
             // For anything in this case, what and how we value number
-            // guarantees that any side-effets that would have occurred (ie
+            // guarantees that any side-effects that would have occurred (ie
             // throwing, etc) can be proven to either still occur (because it's
             // dominated by something that has the same side-effects), or never
             // occur.  Otherwise, we would not have been able to prove it value

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87795