[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] add check to suggest replacement of nested std::min or std::max with initializer lists (PR #85572)
Julian Schmidt via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Mar 24 08:20:00 PDT 2024
================
@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
+//===--- MinMaxUseInitializerListCheck.cpp - clang-tidy -------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "MinMaxUseInitializerListCheck.h"
+#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
+#include "clang/Frontend/CompilerInstance.h"
+#include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h"
+
+using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
+
+namespace clang::tidy::modernize {
+
+MinMaxUseInitializerListCheck::MinMaxUseInitializerListCheck(
+ StringRef Name, ClangTidyContext *Context)
+ : ClangTidyCheck(Name, Context),
+ Inserter(Options.getLocalOrGlobal("IncludeStyle",
+ utils::IncludeSorter::IS_LLVM),
+ areDiagsSelfContained()) {}
+
+void MinMaxUseInitializerListCheck::storeOptions(
+ ClangTidyOptions::OptionMap &Opts) {
+ Options.store(Opts, "IncludeStyle", Inserter.getStyle());
+}
+
+void MinMaxUseInitializerListCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
+ Finder->addMatcher(
+ callExpr(
+ callee(functionDecl(hasName("::std::max"))),
+ anyOf(hasArgument(
+ 0, callExpr(callee(functionDecl(hasName("::std::max"))))),
+ hasArgument(
+ 1, callExpr(callee(functionDecl(hasName("::std::max")))))),
+ unless(
+ hasParent(callExpr(callee(functionDecl(hasName("::std::max")))))))
+ .bind("topCall"),
+ this);
+
+ Finder->addMatcher(
+ callExpr(
+ callee(functionDecl(hasName("::std::min"))),
+ anyOf(hasArgument(
+ 0, callExpr(callee(functionDecl(hasName("::std::min"))))),
+ hasArgument(
+ 1, callExpr(callee(functionDecl(hasName("::std::min")))))),
+ unless(
+ hasParent(callExpr(callee(functionDecl(hasName("::std::min")))))))
+ .bind("topCall"),
+ this);
+}
+
+void MinMaxUseInitializerListCheck::registerPPCallbacks(
+ const SourceManager &SM, Preprocessor *PP, Preprocessor *ModuleExpanderPP) {
+ Inserter.registerPreprocessor(PP);
+}
+
+void MinMaxUseInitializerListCheck::check(
+ const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Match) {
+ const CallExpr *TopCall = Match.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("topCall");
+ MinMaxUseInitializerListCheck::FindArgsResult Result =
+ findArgs(Match, TopCall);
+
+ if (!Result.First || !Result.Last || Result.Args.size() <= 2) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ std::string ReplacementText = generateReplacement(Match, TopCall, Result);
+
+ diag(TopCall->getBeginLoc(),
+ "do not use nested std::%0 calls, use %1 instead")
+ << TopCall->getDirectCallee()->getName() << ReplacementText
+ << FixItHint::CreateReplacement(
+ CharSourceRange::getTokenRange(TopCall->getBeginLoc(),
+ TopCall->getEndLoc()),
----------------
5chmidti wrote:
You can use `CharSourceRange::getTokenRange(TopCall->getSourceRange())` here. You can actually omit the `CharSourceRange::getTokenRange` as well, your tests pass fine as well. (Unless there was a reason you used `getTokenRange`, then there would be a test missing for that case)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85572
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list