[clang] a4b39f6 - [clang][Interp] Lazily visit const-qualified static data members in C++
Timm Bäder via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Mar 17 10:08:13 PDT 2024
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-03-17T18:07:51+01:00
New Revision: a4b39f651536c5cd8835a93cdea61039db004252
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a4b39f651536c5cd8835a93cdea61039db004252
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a4b39f651536c5cd8835a93cdea61039db004252.diff
LOG: [clang][Interp] Lazily visit const-qualified static data members in C++
Added:
Modified:
clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp
clang/test/AST/Interp/records.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp
index 2557126e7b91bb..6cee3c1af9f66a 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp
@@ -3306,7 +3306,8 @@ bool ByteCodeExprGen<Emitter>::VisitDeclRefExpr(const DeclRefExpr *E) {
if (Ctx.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) {
if (const auto *VD = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(D)) {
// Visit local const variables like normal.
- if (VD->isLocalVarDecl() && VD->getType().isConstQualified()) {
+ if ((VD->isLocalVarDecl() || VD->isStaticDataMember()) &&
+ VD->getType().isConstQualified()) {
if (!this->visitVarDecl(VD))
return false;
// Retry.
diff --git a/clang/test/AST/Interp/records.cpp b/clang/test/AST/Interp/records.cpp
index 769e48fe478a5f..d37d4410c763fb 100644
--- a/clang/test/AST/Interp/records.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/AST/Interp/records.cpp
@@ -1244,3 +1244,23 @@ struct HasNonConstExprMemInit {
int x = f(); // both-note {{non-constexpr function}}
constexpr HasNonConstExprMemInit() {} // both-error {{never produces a constant expression}}
};
+
+namespace {
+ template <class Tp, Tp v>
+ struct integral_constant {
+ static const Tp value = v;
+ };
+
+ template <class Tp, Tp v>
+ const Tp integral_constant<Tp, v>::value;
+
+ typedef integral_constant<bool, true> true_type;
+ typedef integral_constant<bool, false> false_type;
+
+ /// This might look innocent, but we get an evaluateAsInitializer call for the
+ /// static bool member before evaluating the first static_assert, but we do NOT
+ /// get such a call for the second one. So the second one needs to lazily visit
+ /// the data member itself.
+ static_assert(true_type::value, "");
+ static_assert(true_type::value, "");
+}
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list