[clang] [Driver] Don't alias -mstrict-align to -mno-unaligned-access (PR #85350)
YunQiang Su via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Mar 14 21:32:48 PDT 2024
================
@@ -321,9 +321,11 @@ void aarch64::getAArch64TargetFeatures(const Driver &D,
}
}
- if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_mno_unaligned_access,
- options::OPT_munaligned_access)) {
- if (A->getOption().matches(options::OPT_mno_unaligned_access))
+ if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(
+ options::OPT_mstrict_align, options::OPT_mno_strict_align,
+ options::OPT_mno_unaligned_access, options::OPT_munaligned_access)) {
+ if (A->getOption().matches(options::OPT_mstrict_align) ||
+ A->getOption().matches(options::OPT_mno_unaligned_access))
----------------
wzssyqa wrote:
Why keep `mno_unaligned_access` for AArch64 while remove it from RISC-V and LoongArch?
In fact `mno_unaligned_access` is not supported by GCC for AArch64?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85350
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list