[clang] [clang][PowerPC] Add flag to enable compatibility with GNU for complex arguments (PR #77732)

[Kishan Parmar via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -337,12 +347,58 @@ CharUnits PPC32_SVR4_ABIInfo::getParamTypeAlignment(QualType Ty) const {
   return CharUnits::fromQuantity(4);
 }
 
+ABIArgInfo PPC32_SVR4_ABIInfo::handleComplex(uint64_t &TypeSize) const {
+  llvm::Type *ElemTy;
+  unsigned RegsNeeded; // Registers Needed for Complex.
+
+  if (TypeSize == 64) {
+    ElemTy = llvm::Type::getInt64Ty(getVMContext());
+    RegsNeeded = 1;
+  } else {
+    ElemTy = llvm::Type::getInt32Ty(getVMContext());
+    RegsNeeded = (TypeSize + 31) / 32;
+  }
+  return ABIArgInfo::getDirect(llvm::ArrayType::get(ElemTy, RegsNeeded));
+}
+
+ABIArgInfo PPC32_SVR4_ABIInfo::classifyArgumentType(QualType Ty,
+                                                    int &ArgGPRsLeft) const {
+  assert(ArgGPRsLeft <= NumArgGPRs && "Arg GPR tracking underflow");
+  Ty = useFirstFieldIfTransparentUnion(Ty);
+
+  ASTContext &Context = getContext();
+
+  uint64_t TypeSize = Context.getTypeSize(Ty);
+
+  if (IsComplexInRegABI && Ty->isAnyComplexType() &&
+      TypeSize <= RegLen * ArgGPRsLeft) {
+    assert(Ty->isAnyComplexType() && "Ty must be Complex type.");
----------------
Long5hot wrote:

I apologize because, There's a bug here. for if not IsComplexInRegABI we need to --ArgGPRsLeft;
Will test and update the review accordingly.
Thank you.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77732