[clang] [Clang] [CodeGen] Fix codegen bug in constant initialisation in C23 mode (PR #84981)

[via cfe-commits]

https://github.com/Sirraide created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84981

Consider the following code:
```c
bool const inf =  (1.0/0.0);
``` 

When trying to emit the initialiser of this variable in C23, we end up hitting a code path in codegen in `VarDecl::evaluateValueImpl()` where we check for `IsConstantInitialization && (Ctx.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus || Ctx.getLangOpts().C23)`, and if that is the case and we emitted any notes, constant evaluation fails, and as a result, codegen issues this error:
```
<source>:1:12: error: cannot compile this static initializer yet
    1 | bool const inf =  (1.0/0.0);
      |        
```

As a fix, only fail in C23 mode if we’re initialising a `constexpr` variable.

This fixes #84784.

>From b60ff0c29f367306beb5ea0965dfaf5b7f361654 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sirraide <aeternalmail at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:53:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] [CodeGen] Fix codegen bug in constant initialisation
 in C23 mode

---
 clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst     | 3 +++
 clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp          | 4 +++-
 clang/test/CodeGen/const-init.c | 3 +++
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index f61dca9bbc8467..c773991b43f47c 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -259,6 +259,9 @@ Bug Fixes in This Version
   operator.
   Fixes (#GH83267).
 
+- Clang no longer fails to codegen static ``const`` variables whose initialiser performs
+  a floating-point division by 0 in C23.
+
 Bug Fixes to Compiler Builtins
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp
index d681791d3920c3..38317dea6d22fe 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp
@@ -2581,7 +2581,9 @@ APValue *VarDecl::evaluateValueImpl(SmallVectorImpl<PartialDiagnosticAt> &Notes,
   // case, we can't keep the result, because it may only be correct under the
   // assumption that the initializer is a constant context.
   if (IsConstantInitialization &&
-      (Ctx.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus || Ctx.getLangOpts().C23) && !Notes.empty())
+      (Ctx.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus ||
+       (isConstexpr() && Ctx.getLangOpts().C23)) &&
+      !Notes.empty())
     Result = false;
 
   // Ensure the computed APValue is cleaned up later if evaluation succeeded,
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/const-init.c b/clang/test/CodeGen/const-init.c
index 0e4fc4ad48af8d..ad3e9551199ac2 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGen/const-init.c
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/const-init.c
@@ -216,3 +216,6 @@ int PR4517_x2 = PR4517_arrc[PR4517_idx];
 // CHECK: @PR4517_x = global i32 42, align 4
 // CHECK: @PR4517_idx = constant i32 1, align 4
 // CHECK: @PR4517_x2 = global i32 42, align 4
+
+// CHECK: @GH84784_inf = constant i8 1
+_Bool const GH84784_inf = (1.0/0.0);