[clang] [compiler-rt] [clang][UBSan] Add implicit conversion check for bitfields (PR #75481)
Richard Smith via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Mar 8 14:28:04 PST 2024
================
@@ -5571,11 +5571,50 @@ LValue CodeGenFunction::EmitBinaryOperatorLValue(const BinaryOperator *E) {
break;
}
- RValue RV = EmitAnyExpr(E->getRHS());
+ llvm::Value *Previous = nullptr;
+ RValue RV;
+ QualType SrcType = E->getRHS()->getType();
+ // Check if LHS is a bitfield and sanitizer checks are enabled
+ if (E->getLHS()->refersToBitField() &&
+ SanOpts.hasOneOf(SanitizerKind::ImplicitConversion |
+ SanitizerKind::ImplicitBitfieldConversion)) {
+ // Get the RHS before scalar conversion
+ if (auto *ICE = GetOriginalRHSForBitfieldSanitizer(E)) {
+ SrcType = ICE->getSubExpr()->getType();
+ Previous = EmitScalarExpr(ICE->getSubExpr());
+ // Pass default ScalarConversionOpts to avoid emitting
+ // integer sanitizer checks as E refers to bitfield
+ llvm::Value *RHS = EmitScalarConversion(
+ Previous, SrcType, ICE->getType(), ICE->getExprLoc());
+ RV = RValue::get(RHS);
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Otherwise, visit RHS as usual
+ if (!Previous)
+ RV = EmitAnyExpr(E->getRHS());
+
LValue LV = EmitCheckedLValue(E->getLHS(), TCK_Store);
+
if (RV.isScalar())
EmitNullabilityCheck(LV, RV.getScalarVal(), E->getExprLoc());
- EmitStoreThroughLValue(RV, LV);
+
+ // Passing a pointer EmitStoreThroughBitfieldLValue will emit the result
+ // If sanitizer checks are not used, we do not use the result
+ // Hence, use EmitStoreThroughLValue instead
+ if (LV.isBitField() && RV.isScalar() &&
+ SanOpts.hasOneOf(SanitizerKind::ImplicitBitfieldConversion)) {
+ // If the expression contained an implicit conversion, make sure
+ // to use the value before the scalar conversion.
+ llvm::Value *Src = Previous ? Previous : RV.getScalarVal();
+ QualType DstType = E->getLHS()->getType();
+ llvm::Value *Result;
+ EmitStoreThroughBitfieldLValue(RV, LV, &Result);
+ EmitBitfieldConversionCheck(Src, SrcType, Result, DstType,
+ LV.getBitFieldInfo(), E->getExprLoc());
+ } else
+ EmitStoreThroughLValue(RV, LV);
----------------
zygoloid wrote:
Same here: can we use the same code regardless, and just make a choice between passing in `&Result` and passing in `nullptr` to `EmitStoreThroughBitfieldLValue`, and a choice as to whether we `EmitBitfieldConversionCheck`, based on the sanitizer mode?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75481
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list