================
@@ -33,30 +33,33 @@ namespace ento {
/// checking.
///
/// \sa CheckerContext
-class CheckerDocumentation : public Checker< check::PreStmt<ReturnStmt>,
- check::PostStmt<DeclStmt>,
- check::PreObjCMessage,
- check::PostObjCMessage,
- check::ObjCMessageNil,
- check::PreCall,
- check::PostCall,
- check::BranchCondition,
- check::NewAllocator,
- check::Location,
- check::Bind,
- check::DeadSymbols,
- check::BeginFunction,
- check::EndFunction,
- check::EndAnalysis,
- check::EndOfTranslationUnit,
- eval::Call,
- eval::Assume,
- check::LiveSymbols,
- check::RegionChanges,
- check::PointerEscape,
- check::ConstPointerEscape,
- check::Event<ImplicitNullDerefEvent>,
- check::ASTDecl<FunctionDecl> > {
+class CheckerDocumentation : public Checker< //
+ check::ASTCodeBody, //
+ check::ASTDecl<FunctionDecl>, //
+ check::BeginFunction, //
+ check::Bind, //
+ check::BranchCondition, //
+ check::ConstPointerEscape, //
+ check::DeadSymbols, //
+ check::EndAnalysis, //
+ check::EndFunction, //
+ check::EndOfTranslationUnit, //
+ check::Event<ImplicitNullDerefEvent>, //
+ check::LiveSymbols, //
+ check::Location, //
+ check::NewAllocator, //
+ check::ObjCMessageNil, //
+ check::PointerEscape, //
+ check::PostCall, //
+ check::PostObjCMessage, //
+ check::PostStmt<DeclStmt>, //
+ check::PreCall, //
+ check::PreObjCMessage, //
+ check::PreStmt<ReturnStmt>, //
+ check::RegionChanges, //
+ eval::Assume, //
+ eval::Call //
----------------
NagyDonat wrote:
I had a weak suspicion that it might be clang-format related; but I think that an explicit "clang-format off" would be significantly better in this case.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84160