[clang] [clang] Bugfix for choosing the more specialized overload (PR #83279)

[via cfe-commits]

Botond =?utf-8?q?István_Horváth?=,Botond Istvan Horvath
 <horvath.botond.istvan at gmail.com>,Botond Istvan Horvath
 <horvath.botond.istvan at gmail.com>,Botond Istvan Horvath
 <horvath.botond.istvan at gmail.com>,Botond Istvan Horvath
 <horvath.botond.istvan at gmail.com>,Botond Istvan Horvath
 <horvath.botond.istvan at gmail.com>,Botond Istvan Horvath
 <horvath.botond.istvan at gmail.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83279 at github.com>


cor3ntin wrote:

> @erichkeane a question: this PR is partly a fix for a DR for c++20. Right now I only apply the fix for C++20 and newer. Is there a reason for not applying this fix for older standards? I don't see how it would break any existing code, and making the fix retroactive doesn't make any test fail.

I don't think checking for c++20 is useful because rewritten candidates are a c++20- feature anyway  

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83279