[clang] [clang] Add -Wmissing-designated-field-initializers (PR #81364)

[Erich Keane via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -2363,8 +2356,11 @@ void InitListChecker::CheckStructUnionTypes(
   }
 
   // Emit warnings for missing struct field initializers.
-  if (!VerifyOnly && InitializedSomething && CheckForMissingFields &&
-      !RD->isUnion()) {
+  // This check is disabled for designated initializers in C.
+  // This matches gcc behaviour.
+  if (!VerifyOnly && InitializedSomething && !RD->isUnion() &&
+      !IList->isIdiomaticZeroInitializer(SemaRef.getLangOpts()) &&
+      !(HasDesignatedInit && !SemaRef.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus)) {
----------------
erichkeane wrote:

That one definitely helps... I was hoping they grouped better.  But I guess if that is what we can get.  Basically my issue is how difficult it was to deduce what I was looking at with all hte conditions.  Perhaps Aaron has a suggestion.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81364