[clang] [clang] Bugfix for choosing the more specialized overload (PR #83279)

[via cfe-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff 8e51b22ce21b01ae0be8267c5da3703ffd3b2c5b 68200ecf3267d1b3940fa73c25c50ee706932a98 -- clang/include/clang/Sema/Sema.h clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
index 60138236ab..74d714ad30 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
@@ -10543,7 +10543,6 @@ bool clang::isBetterOverloadCandidate(
             Cand1.isReversed() ^ Cand2.isReversed())) {
       return BetterTemplate == Cand1.Function->getPrimaryTemplate();
     }
-
   }
 
   //   -— F1 and F2 are non-template functions with the same

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83279