[clang] 19e518d - [Clang][Parser] Have the depth of the abbreviated generic lambdas inside a requires clause differ from the surrounding generic lambda (#80656)
via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Feb 22 17:36:37 PST 2024
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2024-02-23T09:36:32+08:00
New Revision: 19e518d2623c0e87a87ebf30405e74448bd1ee70
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/19e518d2623c0e87a87ebf30405e74448bd1ee70
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/19e518d2623c0e87a87ebf30405e74448bd1ee70.diff
LOG: [Clang][Parser] Have the depth of the abbreviated generic lambdas inside a requires clause differ from the surrounding generic lambda (#80656)
A one-line fix, again : )
This fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/78524 and the
similar example at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/78524#issuecomment-1899886951.
We previously increased the template depth by one after parsing the
attaching requires-clause on a lambda expression. This led to a problem
where the 'auto' parameters of nested abbreviated generic lambdas,
inside of a requires-expression, had the same depth as the template
parameters of the surrounding lambda. Consequently, during the
concept-checking stage, we ended up substituting these parameters with
the wrong template arguments because they were at different levels.
Added:
Modified:
clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
clang/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
clang/test/Parser/cxx-concepts-requires-clause.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index 19cc5b77564316..529dd783ab7382 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -277,6 +277,10 @@ Bug Fixes to C++ Support
(`#82258 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/82258>`_)
- Correctly immediate-escalate lambda conversion functions.
(`#82258 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/82258>`_)
+- Fixed an issue where template parameters of a nested abbreviated generic lambda within
+ a requires-clause lie at the same depth as those of the surrounding lambda. This,
+ in turn, results in the wrong template argument substitution during constraint checking.
+ (`#78524 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/78524>`_)
Bug Fixes to AST Handling
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
diff --git a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
index fd262ff31e661a..22ee60af4616d2 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
@@ -1385,6 +1385,16 @@ ExprResult Parser::ParseLambdaExpressionAfterIntroducer(
Diag(RAngleLoc,
diag::err_lambda_template_parameter_list_empty);
} else {
+ // We increase the template depth before recursing into a requires-clause.
+ //
+ // This depth is used for setting up a LambdaScopeInfo (in
+ // Sema::RecordParsingTemplateParameterDepth), which is used later when
+ // inventing template parameters in InventTemplateParameter.
+ //
+ // This way, abbreviated generic lambdas could have
diff erent template
+ // depths, avoiding substitution into the wrong template parameters during
+ // constraint satisfaction check.
+ ++CurTemplateDepthTracker;
ExprResult RequiresClause;
if (TryConsumeToken(tok::kw_requires)) {
RequiresClause =
@@ -1396,7 +1406,6 @@ ExprResult Parser::ParseLambdaExpressionAfterIntroducer(
Actions.ActOnLambdaExplicitTemplateParameterList(
Intro, LAngleLoc, TemplateParams, RAngleLoc, RequiresClause);
- ++CurTemplateDepthTracker;
}
}
diff --git a/clang/test/Parser/cxx-concepts-requires-clause.cpp b/clang/test/Parser/cxx-concepts-requires-clause.cpp
index 1ec1eefa128653..5b5bc9ea978bf2 100644
--- a/clang/test/Parser/cxx-concepts-requires-clause.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/Parser/cxx-concepts-requires-clause.cpp
@@ -168,3 +168,30 @@ auto lambda4 = [] requires(sizeof(char) == 1){}; // expected-error {{expected bo
#if __cplusplus <= 202002L
// expected-warning at -2{{lambda without a parameter clause is a C++23 extension}}
#endif
+
+namespace GH78524 {
+
+template <typename T> T Foo;
+
+template <typename T> auto C(Foo<T>);
+
+template <typename T> struct D {
+ decltype(T()(C<T>)) Type;
+};
+
+template <typename T, typename U> D<T> G(T, U) { return {}; }
+
+struct E {};
+
+void F() {
+ G([]<typename T>
+// ~~~~~~~~~~ T: Depth: 0, Index: 0
+ requires requires { [](auto...) {}; }(T)
+// ~~~~ auto: Depth: 1, Index: 0
+ { return T(); },
+ E{});
+}
+
+int a = []<int=0> requires requires { [](auto){}; } { return 0; }();
+
+} // namespace GH78524
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list