[clang] [dataflow] CXXOperatorCallExpr equal operator might not be a glvalue (PR #80991)

via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Feb 7 06:03:16 PST 2024


llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Paul Semel (paulsemel)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

Although in a normal implementation the assumption is reasonable, it seems that some esoteric implementation are not returning a T&. This should be handled correctly and the values be propagated.

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80991.diff


2 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Transfer.cpp (+13-1) 
- (modified) clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/TransferTest.cpp (+36) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Transfer.cpp b/clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Transfer.cpp
index bb3aec763c29ca..fb1c6848197339 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Transfer.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Transfer.cpp
@@ -535,7 +535,19 @@ class TransferVisitor : public ConstStmtVisitor<TransferVisitor> {
         return;
 
       copyRecord(*LocSrc, *LocDst, Env);
-      Env.setStorageLocation(*S, *LocDst);
+
+      // If the expr is a glvalue, we can reasonably assume the operator is
+      // returning T& and thus we can assign it `LocDst`.
+      if (S->isGLValue()) {
+        Env.setStorageLocation(*S, *LocDst);
+      } else if (S->getType()->isRecordType() && S->isPRValue()) {
+        // If the expr is a prvalue, we cannot really assume anything regarding
+        // the new value being created. We should just propagate it to ensure a
+        // `RecordValue` exist for it.
+        if (Env.getValue(*S) == nullptr)
+          refreshRecordValue(*S, Env);
+      }
+
       return;
     }
 
diff --git a/clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/TransferTest.cpp b/clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/TransferTest.cpp
index 8bbb04024dcce6..86f4081c798d55 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/TransferTest.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/TransferTest.cpp
@@ -2313,6 +2313,42 @@ TEST(TransferTest, AssignmentOperatorWithInitAndInheritance) {
          ASTContext &ASTCtx) {});
 }
 
+TEST(TransferTest, CXXOperatorCallExprEqualReturnsVoid) {
+  // This is a crash repro.
+  std::string Code = R"(
+    struct B {
+      void operator=(B&& other);
+    };
+    void target() {
+      B b;
+      b = B();
+      // [[p]]
+    }
+  )";
+  runDataflow(
+      Code,
+      [](const llvm::StringMap<DataflowAnalysisState<NoopLattice>> &Results,
+         ASTContext &ASTCtx) {});
+}
+
+TEST(TransferTest, CXXOperatorCallExprEqualReturnsPRValue) {
+  // This is a crash repro.
+  std::string Code = R"(
+    struct B {
+      B operator=(B&& other);
+    };
+    void target() {
+      B b;
+      b = B();
+      // [[p]]
+    }
+  )";
+  runDataflow(
+      Code,
+      [](const llvm::StringMap<DataflowAnalysisState<NoopLattice>> &Results,
+         ASTContext &ASTCtx) {});
+}
+
 TEST(TransferTest, CopyConstructor) {
   std::string Code = R"(
     struct A {

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80991


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list