[clang] [libc++] Add builtin to clear padding bytes (prework for P0528R3) (PR #75371)

[Eli Friedman via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -2456,6 +2461,139 @@ static RValue EmitHipStdParUnsupportedBuiltin(CodeGenFunction *CGF,
   return RValue::get(CGF->Builder.CreateCall(UBF, Args));
 }
 
+template <class T>
+void RecursivelyClearPaddingImpl(CodeGenFunction &CGF, Value *Ptr, QualType Ty, size_t CurrentStartOffset, size_t &RunningOffset, T&& WriteZeroAtOffset);
+
+template <class T>
+void ClearPaddingStruct(CodeGenFunction &CGF, Value *Ptr, QualType Ty, StructType *ST, 
+                        size_t CurrentStartOffset, size_t &RunningOffset, T&& WriteZeroAtOffset) {
+  std::cerr << "\n struct! " << ST->getName().data() << std::endl;
+  auto SL = CGF.CGM.getModule().getDataLayout().getStructLayout(ST);
+
+  auto R = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(Ty->getAsRecordDecl());
+  if(!R) {
+    std::cerr << "\n not a CXXRecordDecl" << std::endl;
+
+  }
+  const ASTRecordLayout &ASTLayout = CGF.getContext().getASTRecordLayout(R);
+  for (auto Base : R->bases()) {
----------------
efriedma-quic wrote:

Is iterating over bases/fields like this actually guaranteed to return them in order of offset?

Do we need to worry about vtable pointers?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75371