[clang] [clang] Incorrect IR involving the use of bcopy (PR #79298)

[via cfe-commits]

https://github.com/vojkan99 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79298

This patch addresses the issue regarding the call of bcopy function in a conditional expression.
It is analogous to the already accepted patch which deals with the same problem, just regarding the bzero function [0].

Here is the testcase which illustrates the issue:

```
void bcopy(const void *, void *, unsigned long);
void foo(void);

void test_bcopy() {
  char dst[20];
  char src[20];
  int _sz = 20, len = 20;
  return (_sz
          ? ((_sz >= len)
             ? bcopy(src, dst, len)
             : foo())
          : bcopy(src, dst, len));
}
```

When processing it with clang, following issue occurs:

Instruction does not dominate all uses!
  %arraydecay2 = getelementptr inbounds [20 x i8], ptr %dst, i64 0, i64 0, !dbg !38
  %cond = phi ptr [ %arraydecay2, %cond.end ], [ %arraydecay5, %cond.false3 ], !dbg !33
fatal error: error in backend: Broken module found, compilation aborted!

This happens because an incorrect phi node is created. It is created because bcopy function call is lowered to the call of llvm.memmove intrinsic and function memmove returns void *. Since llvm.memmove is called in two places in the same return statement, clang creates a phi node in the final basic block for the return value and that phi node is incorrect. However, bcopy function should return void in the first place, so this phi node is unnecessary. This is what this patch addresses. An appropriate test is also added and no existing tests fail when applying this patch.

Also, this crash only happens when LLVM is configured with -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=On option.

[0] https://reviews.llvm.org/D39746

>From cd7556b90cb291c597b0e56c6fb2986d51ab153f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vojislav Tomasevic <vojislav.tomasevic at syrmia.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:05:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Incorrect IR involving the use of bcopy

This patch fixes the issue when bcopy is used in conditional expression.
---
 clang/lib/CodeGen/CGBuiltin.cpp |  2 +-
 clang/test/CodeGen/builtins.c   | 15 +++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGBuiltin.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGBuiltin.cpp
index 7ef764b8e1ac80..bfe2e45d545322 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGBuiltin.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGBuiltin.cpp
@@ -4011,7 +4011,7 @@ RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitBuiltinExpr(const GlobalDecl GD, unsigned BuiltinID,
     EmitNonNullArgCheck(RValue::get(Dest.getPointer()), E->getArg(1)->getType(),
                         E->getArg(1)->getExprLoc(), FD, 0);
     Builder.CreateMemMove(Dest, Src, SizeVal, false);
-    return RValue::get(Dest.getPointer());
+    return RValue::get(nullptr);
   }
 
   case Builtin::BImemcpy:
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/builtins.c b/clang/test/CodeGen/builtins.c
index ce1182b724dcc2..ed03233b6f1a96 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGen/builtins.c
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/builtins.c
@@ -202,6 +202,21 @@ void test_conditional_bzero(void) {
   // CHECK-NOT: phi
 }
 
+// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} void @test_conditional_bcopy
+void test_conditional_bcopy(void) {
+  char dst[20];
+  char src[20];
+  int _sz = 20, len = 20;
+  return (_sz
+          ? ((_sz >= len)
+              ? __builtin_bcopy(src, dst, len)
+              : foo())
+          : __builtin_bcopy(src, dst, len));
+  // CHECK: call void @llvm.memmove
+  // CHECK: call void @llvm.memmove
+  // CHECK-NOT: phi
+}
+
 // CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} void @test_float_builtins
 void test_float_builtins(__fp16 *H, float F, double D, long double LD) {
   volatile int res;