[clang-tools-extra] [flang] [compiler-rt] [lld] [llvm] [libcxx] [clang] [lldb] [libc] [Clang][C++23] Implement P2448R2: Relaxing some constexpr restrictions (PR #77753)
via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jan 24 02:42:19 PST 2024
================
@@ -9108,7 +9123,8 @@ bool Sema::CheckExplicitlyDefaultedComparison(Scope *S, FunctionDecl *FD,
// declaration, it is implicitly considered to be constexpr.
// FIXME: Only applying this to the first declaration seems problematic, as
// simple reorderings can affect the meaning of the program.
- if (First && !FD->isConstexpr() && Info.Constexpr)
+ if ((First && !FD->isConstexpr() && Info.Constexpr) ||
+ getLangOpts().CPlusPlus23)
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
isn't `Info.Constexpr` always true in c++ mode?
I'm trying to think of a meaningful test.
Haybe calling a comparison function of a class with a non-literal member from a consteval function?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77753
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list