[clang] [coroutines][coro_lifetimebound] Detect lifetime issues with lambda captures (PR #77066)
Utkarsh Saxena via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 11 07:29:01 PST 2024
================
@@ -7575,15 +7577,27 @@ static void visitLifetimeBoundArguments(IndirectLocalPath &Path, Expr *Call,
Path.pop_back();
};
- if (ObjectArg && implicitObjectParamIsLifetimeBound(Callee))
- VisitLifetimeBoundArg(Callee, ObjectArg);
-
bool CheckCoroCall = false;
if (const auto *RD = Callee->getReturnType()->getAsRecordDecl()) {
CheckCoroCall = RD->hasAttr<CoroLifetimeBoundAttr>() &&
RD->hasAttr<CoroReturnTypeAttr>() &&
!Callee->hasAttr<CoroDisableLifetimeBoundAttr>();
}
+
+ if (ObjectArg) {
+ bool CheckCoroObjArg = CheckCoroCall;
+ // Ignore `__promise.get_return_object()` as it is not lifetimebound.
+ if (CheckCoroObjArg && Callee->getDeclName().isIdentifier() &&
+ Callee->getName() == "get_return_object")
+ CheckCoroObjArg = false;
----------------
usx95 wrote:
Promise type lookup would need to go through coroutine traits. We could lookup `coroutine_traits<R>::promise_type` but does not work with `coroutine_traits` specialized for non-empty parameter list.
The new approach implicitly adds `[[clang::coro_wrapper]]` and `[[clang::coro_disable_lifetimebound]]` to `get_return_type` found through a promise lookup.
WDYT ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77066
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list