[clang] [coroutines][coro_lifetimebound] Detect lifetime issues with lambda captures (PR #77066)

[Chuanqi Xu via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -7575,15 +7577,27 @@ static void visitLifetimeBoundArguments(IndirectLocalPath &Path, Expr *Call,
     Path.pop_back();
   };
 
-  if (ObjectArg && implicitObjectParamIsLifetimeBound(Callee))
-    VisitLifetimeBoundArg(Callee, ObjectArg);
-
   bool CheckCoroCall = false;
   if (const auto *RD = Callee->getReturnType()->getAsRecordDecl()) {
     CheckCoroCall = RD->hasAttr<CoroLifetimeBoundAttr>() &&
                     RD->hasAttr<CoroReturnTypeAttr>() &&
                     !Callee->hasAttr<CoroDisableLifetimeBoundAttr>();
   }
+
+  if (ObjectArg) {
+    bool CheckCoroObjArg = CheckCoroCall;
+    // Ignore `__promise.get_return_object()` as it is not lifetimebound.
+    if (CheckCoroObjArg && Callee->getDeclName().isIdentifier() &&
+        Callee->getName() == "get_return_object")
+      CheckCoroObjArg = false;
----------------
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:

hmmm it looks worse now... if our previous suggestion is hard to implement, I'll suggest to do a coroutine lookup here. For example, we know a class is marked with coro_lifetimebound attribute, then we should be able to find the corresponding promise_type, right? And if yes, we can give exceptions to the member functions of the promise_type so that we can cover the case here.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77066