[clang] [clang][coverage] fixing "if constexpr" and "if consteval" coverage report (PR #77214)
Paweł Bylica via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Jan 7 03:05:29 PST 2024
chfast wrote:
> But in future it would be useful to mark whole gap there as skipped instead. If there is interest I would do it in another PR.
This would be very useful not to treat compile-time unreachable code as uncovered. Can the skipped code be marked separately in the reports?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77214
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list