[clang] [clang-format] Handle templated elaborated type specifier in function… (PR #77013)

[Björn Schäpers via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -3914,7 +3914,15 @@ void UnwrappedLineParser::parseRecord(bool ParseAsExpr) {
   // (this would still leave us with an ambiguity between template function
   // and class declarations).
   if (FormatTok->isOneOf(tok::colon, tok::less)) {
----------------
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:

Why can't we use `parseAngle`? (Don't know if that would lead to better results.)

This can easily be broken with `class A<X > 3> f() {}`, right?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77013