[mlir] [libcxx] [clang] [libc] [llvm] [flang] [libc++][memory] P1132R8: out_ptr - a scalable output pointer abstraction (PR #73618)

[Louis Dionne via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -242,6 +248,57 @@ auto to_address(const _Pointer& __p) noexcept -> decltype(std::__to_address(__p)
 }
 #endif
 
+#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 23
+
+template <class _Tp>
+struct __pointer_of {};
+
+template <class _Tp>
+  requires(__has_pointer<_Tp>::value)
+struct __pointer_of<_Tp> {
+  using type = typename _Tp::pointer;
+};
+
+template <class _Tp>
+  requires(!__has_pointer<_Tp>::value && __has_element_type<_Tp>::value)
+struct __pointer_of<_Tp> {
+  using type = typename _Tp::element_type*;
+};
+
+template <class _Tp>
+  requires(!__has_pointer<_Tp>::value && !__has_element_type<_Tp>::value &&
+           __has_element_type<pointer_traits<_Tp>>::value)
+struct __pointer_of<_Tp> {
+  using type = typename pointer_traits<_Tp>::element_type*;
+};
+
+template <typename _Tp>
+using __pointer_of_t = typename __pointer_of<_Tp>::type;
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Up>
+struct __pointer_of_or {
+  using type _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = _Up;
+};
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Up>
+  requires requires { typename __pointer_of_t<_Tp>; }
+struct __pointer_of_or<_Tp, _Up> {
+  using type _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = __pointer_of_t<_Tp>;
+};
+
+template <typename _Tp, typename _Up>
+using __pointer_of_or_t = typename __pointer_of_or<_Tp, _Up>::type;
+
+template <class _Smart>
+concept __resettable_smart_pointer = requires(_Smart __s) { __s.reset(); };
+
+template <class _Smart, class _Pointer = void, class... _Args>
----------------
ldionne wrote:

Is the `= void` necessary here? It doesn't seem like you ever use it. What happens if you remove it?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73618