[clang] [llvm] [ValueTracking] Add dominating condition support in computeKnownBits() (PR #73662)
Nikita Popov via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Dec 1 07:12:28 PST 2023
================
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+//===- DomConditionCache.cpp ----------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "llvm/Analysis/DomConditionCache.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/PatternMatch.h"
+
+using namespace llvm;
+using namespace llvm::PatternMatch;
+
+// TODO: This code is very similar to findAffectedValues() in
+// AssumptionCache, but currently specialized to just the patterns that
+// computeKnownBits() supports, and without the notion of result elem indices
+// that are AC specific. Deduplicate this code once we have a clearer picture
+// of how much they can be shared.
+static void findAffectedValues(Value *Cond,
+ SmallVectorImpl<Value *> &Affected) {
+ auto AddAffected = [&Affected](Value *V) {
+ if (isa<Argument>(V) || isa<GlobalValue>(V)) {
+ Affected.push_back(V);
+ } else if (auto *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V)) {
+ Affected.push_back(I);
+
+ // Peek through unary operators to find the source of the condition.
+ Value *Op;
+ if (match(I, m_PtrToInt(m_Value(Op)))) {
+ if (isa<Instruction>(Op) || isa<Argument>(Op))
+ Affected.push_back(Op);
+ }
+ }
+ };
+
+ ICmpInst::Predicate Pred;
+ Value *A;
+ Constant *C;
+ if (match(Cond, m_ICmp(Pred, m_Value(A), m_Constant(C)))) {
+ AddAffected(A);
+
+ if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ) {
+ Value *X;
+ // (X & C) or (X | C) or (X ^ C).
+ // (X << C) or (X >>_s C) or (X >>_u C).
+ if (match(A, m_BitwiseLogic(m_Value(X), m_ConstantInt())) ||
+ match(A, m_Shift(m_Value(X), m_ConstantInt())))
+ AddAffected(X);
+ } else if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE) {
+ Value *X;
+ // Handle (X & pow2 != 0).
+ if (match(A, m_And(m_Value(X), m_Power2())) && match(C, m_Zero()))
+ AddAffected(X);
+ } else if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT) {
----------------
nikic wrote:
Done! I've also relaxed the condition for EQ/NE to isEquality, as we may invert the predicate. Due to canonicalization this makes essentially no difference in practice though (maybe something in multi-use scenarios).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73662
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list