[clang-tools-extra] [clangd] Resolve the dependent type from its single instantiation. Take 1 (PR #71279)

[Younan Zhang via cfe-commits]

zyn0217 wrote:

> I also discovered some complications related to nested templates, and I have some thoughts on how to resolve them, but I'm going to suggest that we start with getting a simple case (e.g. just one level of templates, no nested templates) to work, and then tackle nested templates as a next step.

Oops, I replied too quickly and I should have noticed this paragraph. Does my previous comment elaborate on the same issue you've encountered? Could you kindly share your thoughts more?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71279