[clang] [clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] Added new check to detect redundant inline keyword (PR #73069)

[via cfe-commits]

=?utf-8?q?F=C3=A9lix-Antoine?= Constantin
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73069 at github.com>


================
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - readability-redundant-inline-specifier
+
+readability-redundant-inline-specifier
+======================================
+
+Checks for instances of the `inline` keyword in code where it is redundant
+and recommends its removal.
+
+Examples:
+
+.. code-block:: c++
+
+   constexpr inline void f() {}
+
+In the example abvove the keyword `inline` is redundant since constexpr
----------------
EugeneZelenko wrote:

Please use double back-ticks for language constructs. Same in other places.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73069