[clang] [C++20] [Modules] Introduce thin BMI (PR #71622)

[Chuanqi Xu via cfe-commits]

ChuanqiXu9 wrote:

> It was suggested to avoid "thin" and "fat" terminology (I started using it with LTO as a precedent for the terms), but I suppose something more descriptive could be selected.

Any suggestions? My english is not good, you know.

> I'll also note that my prior usage was in reference to embedding transitive BMI references in the BMI, not about including function definitions.

May you elaborate on this? I don't understand since I feel they are unrelated. Are you saying: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62707? I feel they are orthogonal.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71622