[clang] [CodeGen] Revamp counted_by calculations (PR #70606)
Yeoul Na via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Oct 31 14:59:14 PDT 2023
================
@@ -859,53 +859,60 @@ CodeGenFunction::emitBuiltinObjectSize(const Expr *E, unsigned Type,
}
if (IsDynamic) {
- LangOptions::StrictFlexArraysLevelKind StrictFlexArraysLevel =
- getLangOpts().getStrictFlexArraysLevel();
- const Expr *Base = E->IgnoreParenImpCasts();
-
- if (FieldDecl *FD = FindCountedByField(Base, StrictFlexArraysLevel)) {
- const auto *ME = dyn_cast<MemberExpr>(Base);
- llvm::Value *ObjectSize = nullptr;
-
- if (!ME) {
- const auto *DRE = dyn_cast<DeclRefExpr>(Base);
- ValueDecl *VD = nullptr;
-
- ObjectSize = ConstantInt::get(
- ResType,
- getContext().getTypeSize(DRE->getType()->getPointeeType()) / 8,
- true);
-
- if (auto *RD = DRE->getType()->getPointeeType()->getAsRecordDecl())
- VD = RD->getLastField();
-
- Expr *ICE = ImplicitCastExpr::Create(
- getContext(), DRE->getType(), CK_LValueToRValue,
- const_cast<Expr *>(cast<Expr>(DRE)), nullptr, VK_PRValue,
- FPOptionsOverride());
- ME = MemberExpr::CreateImplicit(getContext(), ICE, true, VD,
- VD->getType(), VK_LValue, OK_Ordinary);
- }
-
- // At this point, we know that \p ME is a flexible array member.
- const auto *ArrayTy = getContext().getAsArrayType(ME->getType());
+ // The code generated here calculates the size of a struct with a flexible
+ // array member that uses the counted_by attribute. There are two instances
+ // we handle:
+ //
+ // struct s {
+ // unsigned long flags;
+ // int count;
+ // int array[] __attribute__((counted_by(count)));
+ // }
+ //
+ // 1) bdos of the flexible array itself:
+ //
+ // __builtin_dynamic_object_size(p->array, 1) ==
+ // p->count * sizeof(*p->array)
+ //
+ // 2) bdos of the whole struct, including the flexible array:
+ //
+ // __builtin_dynamic_object_size(p, 1) ==
+ // sizeof(*p) + p->count * sizeof(*p->array)
----------------
rapidsna wrote:
> Note: sizeof(*p) + p->count * sizeof(*p->array) returning 23 is exactly what I want here. :-) At least with regard to __builtin_dynamic_object_size().
hmm, I see. So, that's not what `-fbounds-safety` is meant to work: `__counted_by` on fam in -fbounds-safety is to exactly add `count` trailing elements from `&s->fam[0]`. So I think this semantic difference between two modes going to be a problem (e.g., accessing the offset 22 of the object, for example, will be considered OOB in -fbounds-safety).
Is there a reason you want it to be this way? I know people tends to do `malloc(sizeof(struct s) + p->count * sizeof(int));` to allocate an object with fam. But people also use `offsetof` and in such cases, `__builtin_dynamic_object_size` can be bigger than what it should be.
```
struct flex {
double dummy;
char c;
char fam [__counted_by(7)];
};
```
If `__builtin_dynamic_object_size` does `sizeof(*p) + p->count * sizeof(*p->array)`, it's like effectively considering `&s->fam[13]` as part of the object.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70606
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list