[clang] [clang][Diagnostics] Highlight code snippets (PR #66514)

[Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits]

Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbaeder at redhat.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm/llvm-project/pull/66514/clang at github.com>


================
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+//===-- CodeSnippetHighlighter.cpp - Code snippet highlighting --*- C++ -*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "clang/Frontend/CodeSnippetHighlighter.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/CharInfo.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/DiagnosticOptions.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/SourceManager.h"
+#include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h"
+#include "clang/Lex/Preprocessor.h"
+#include "clang/Lex/PreprocessorOptions.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
+#include <chrono>
+
+using namespace clang;
+
+// Magenta is taken for 'warning'. Red is already 'error' and 'cya'
+// is already taken for 'note'. Green is already used to underline
+// source ranges. White and black are bad because of the usual
+// terminal backgrounds. Which leaves us only with TWO options.
----------------
AaronBallman wrote:

Heh, if we only have two options, why do we have three below? :-)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66514